Skip to main content

Google Plus users: 9 million or 657,000?

News is traveling around the web and being picked up by the media: After a very short time in existance, Google+ already has over 9 million users, and will pass 10 million soon.  It's taking over the social networking space, on its way to beating Facebook and Twitter, and finally Google has a solid success in social networking.

But is all this really true?

To be clear, I like certain aspects of Google+ a lot.  Hangouts are amazing, Huddles are a great idea, and their location-based mobile features are probably the start of a revolution.  So I'm not bashing Google+ when I say that they may not really have the millions of users that people are talking about.

My guess:  657,000, as of July 12.

If you look at all the articles talking about how many users Google+ has, you'll see that Google isn't saying.  The numbers all come from some pretty complex calculations that people are making, based on how many Google+ users they see with certain names, how many U.S. citizens have those names in recent census data, and how these numbers can be projected into an estimate of worldwide Google+ use.  All very mathematical and fairly scientific.  This post gives a great explanation of the best of these calculations.

I, on the other hand, turn to Google and ask Google to count all the pages on the web site "plus.google.com" that have the word "Google+" in the title.  If you browse around Google+, you'll see that this is the clearest indication of user home pages.  The result: 657,000.

This answer is consistent, regardless of whether you search when logged into your Google account or not, or where you search.  You can see this by clicking here: 


You can also click "next" to your heart's content, and see that all the search results after the first two are in fact Google+ user home pages. 

Several people in Google+ discussions have suggested similar Google searches that show much bigger numbers of results.  Several suggested variants on the following query:


which gives back just over 9 million results.  The problem is that if you go past results page 65 you'll see that most of the results shown aren't Google+ user home pages, but rather Google+ posts, photos, and other content. The reason for this is that Google searches with two search operator criterea will give results with only one of the criteria matched, as lower-down search results.  That's why in my search above I use just one operator and one search word.

The same is true for all Google searches that claim to show 9 million or so Google+ users - go down 60 screens and you'll see non-users.

Interestingly, Google themselves have been quiet about how many users they have.  They're letting the bloggers go wild, but they aren't saying a word themselves.  If they had 10 million users this soon, wouldn't they say something?  But if they don't, how can they burst the bubble that's been created by all the hype?

The fact is, 657,000 Google+ users is great for this early, when the users until now are primarily early adopters.  Go into Junior High schools around the world, they're all using Facebook and are not yet onto Google+. But the early adopter usage is very impressive.

If Google pipes up and says they have 10 million users, I'll be happy to admit that something in my Google search estimation must be wrong.  Until then, take all the numbers you see with a grain of salt.  Or maybe a whole shaker.

Google+ is a great system. Let's stick to the facts about how good it is, and leave the hype out.

Come on Google, give us some facts!

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-
Read more

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y
Read more

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what
Read more