Skip to main content

Indoor navigation comes to iPhone in France

Most indoor location positioning systems rely on Wi-Fi signals - they look at the set of Wi-Fi hotspots that are in range of the phone, and how strong the signals are for each one, and use a database of hotspot locations or a collection of "signal strength fingerprints" to estimate the phone's current location.  This is how must indoor location systems on the market work, including Google's.

But here's the rub: iPhone's iOS doesn't let apps have the Wi-Fi signal strength data.  Many people have speculated why, and I suspect the reason is that they want to keep indoor positioning all to themselves. It's unfortunate, because Apple of all people should know that they win a lot by supporting 3rd-party developers on iOS. But that's how it is.

Two weeks ago we reported the first deployment of a new approach to indoor location, by SenionLab, using sensors in the phone (gyroscope, compass, accelerometer, ...) to detect phone movements and track location step by step.   This approach is called "sensor fusion," a.k.a. "inertial navigation."  Sensor fusion has been in research for years, and we've tracked start-ups bringing it to market.  Now it's here.

Most importantly, sensor fusion technology can in principle run on the iPhone.  But good sensor fusion needs some radio signals as well, to keep the motion sensing from going off track.  The deployment two weeks ago ran (so far) only on Android, combining sensor fusion with Wi-Fi signals, and not on iPhone.

Enter Pole Star, a French company with a U.S. headquarters in Palo Alto.  They started out with Wi-Fi based indoor location technology, and have now added sensor fusion along with Bluetooth signal processing.  Their combined approach has now had several deployments announced in France (see press releases 1, 2). Best of all, their system runs on iPhones.

Pole Star's Bluetooth-based positioning requires that sites deploy their BlueSpot beacons, shown here, which transmit signals that iPhones can use for positioning.  The Bluetooth signal data is combined with sensor fusion to provide accurate positioning.  Android devices can use this same data, along with Wi-Fi signal data, to achieve even more accuracy. Sites that don't deploy the BlueSpots can still use sensor fusion and Wi-Fi signals for positioning.

On both iPhone and Android, a much smoother and more accurate location positioning is delivered by the use of sensor fusion, than can be delivered using Wi-Fi or Bluetooth signals alone.

Grizzly Analytics predicts that sensor fusion will spread, in more apps like these from Pole Star and SenionLab.  We're tracking several other start-ups working on sensor fusion, along with many major mobile and chip companies.  Soon we'll see more start-up companies in this area being acquired, by either mobile OS makers, social network companies or chip makers, and then sensor fusion will be even more central to mobile infrastructure.

We look forward to seeing more and more sensor fusion, and other novel approaches, coming to market and bringing location services indoors!

Want to understand indoor location positioning technology, both on the market and in research at major mobile companies?  The Grizzly Analytics report on indoor location positioning technology analyzes research by Google, Microsoft, Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm, Cisco, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, CSR, Broadcom, STMicroElectronics, and many more, along with systems from over 30 start-up companies.

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what