Skip to main content

Apple iPhone patent and how we understand it

Everyone's talking about the patent just granted to Apple for the iPhone.  The patent seems very broad, and many are talking about how broad the patent is and how it will effect others in the industry. The patent and analysis of the patent are definitely worth a read by anyone in the industry.

Regarding some of the conclusions that people are reaching, however, we want to point out that the iPhone ecosystem was very different when this patent was written.  The patent was filed at the end of 2007.  At the beginning of that year, Apple was not allowing any third party applications on the iPhone, because they were concerned about how they would impact device performance.  In the middle of that year Apple said that third-party applications for the iPhone would be browser-based.  This is the context in which the new patent was written.

So be careful analyzing this patent and drawing conclusions from it about what Apple has in mind. We analyze patents all the time, but they need to be truly understood in terms of technology involved and in terms of the context in which they were written.

This history is also important to remember because it gives us a sense of perspective.  It's easy to say nowadays that the most important aspect of smartphones are apps and app ecosystems.  I'm certainly not against them.  But what we see as important may change, and application ecosystems will likely be eclipsed by something else that comes along soon.  What that will be, now that's the question....

Popular posts from this blog

Sensor-fusion indoor location system in over 30 malls in Singapore

SingTel just deployed indoor mapping and navigation from Swedish start-up  SenionLab  in over 30 shopping malls in Singapore, with 20 more in planning, in the biggest single deployment we've seen yet of customized indoor location technology. The most significant aspect of this deployment is that this is one of the first commercial deployments of indoor location technology that uses a new technology approach called "sensor fusion," which uses sensors in smartphones (gyroscope, compass, accelerometer, ...) to track location by sensing the phone's movements. Most indoor location systems determine location by measuring the signals of nearby Wi-Fi hotspots or cellular antennas, but this risks looking choppy as the phone waits for the radio signals to change to detect the next place it is. Sensing motion using phone sensors makes the system work more smoothly, regardless of radio signal details.  (The SenionLab solution does use Wi-Fi signals as well, to compe...

Seeing Quuppa's indoor location technology at MWC 2015

I first met Fabio and Kimmo from Quuppa in 2012 , before Quuppa existed, when they had spent years researching indoor location positioning technologies at Nokia Research Center. Less than a year after that they formed Quuppa , independent of Nokia, to bring their technology to market. At the time I called Quuppa " the newest and oldest in indoor location positioning ." Fast forward two and a half years. Their technology has reached market, it can now track both smartphones and BLE devices, and it's accurate to within 20-50cm. Before reading more about their technology, take a look at a video of their demo  in action: Grizzly Analytics has analyzed indoor location technologies by over 150 companies , and virtually all of the radio-based technologies operate by measuring the distance  between the device being tracked and other radio devices, and using these distance measurements for either multilateration or fingerprinting. For example, the well known BLE beacons me...

See great indoor location tech from the 2017 testbed

The videos from the Indoor Location Testbed at GeoIoT World 2017 are now released! Here is your chance to see how these solutions performed in our real-world evaluation, in the videos below. The testbed evaluated each solution by walking around a real-world venue, the GeoIoT World 2017 conference, measuring performance at 10 pre-selected points. Click here for the testbed report, which analyzes each solution's performance in a wide variety of metrics, including real-time accuracy, accuracy stabilization, consistency, latency, floor change, first fix, setup time & more. Let's start with BlooLoc's tag-based solution, which achieved accuracy under 2m in real-time and under 1.5m after stabilization: Then let's look at the infrastructure-free solution from GipsTech , which achieved accuracy under 2m without using any beacons or radio signals: Next is GipsTech's solution with BLE added: Next is BlooLoc's phone-based solution: Fin...