Skip to main content

Apple's new iMessage - a threat to who?

Apple just announced, among other things, a new secure messaging system between iOS devices called iMessage.  It certainly looks interesting - it includes multimedia content, multiple recipient chat, and the ability to start a conversation on one iOS device and continue it on another.

A few friends asked "how much will this eat into SMS revenue for carriers."  My answer: Virtually zero.

Very few people message only with iPhone users. Most people message with lots of friends and colleagues, who use a variety of devices.  iMessage will definitely have its uses, but it won't take away a significant amount of SMS revenue.  Even when iPhone users want to message a friend with an iPhone, they'll likely want to use the same system they use for all their messaging, regular SMS, and not have to remember which friends have iPhones.

The bigger question, however, is the effect that this will have on RIM's BlackBerry Messenger (BBM).  If iMessage is provable secure, will enterprises choose to use it for mobile messaging?  This is the huge question that lots of people are asking (e.g., here, here, and here). 

Whether enterprises will adopt iMessage is beyond speculation right now.  But this is yet another reason for a prediction I've been making for a while now: RIM will offer Blackberry e-mail and messenger as a service running on iPhones, Android phones, and other competitor devices.

Basically, they need to. Blackberry devices are losing ground as executives want to use their smartphones for business use. If RIM wants to keep the market lead on secure e-mail and messaging, they need to branch out.

This, I think, is why RIM has made a series of acquisitions in the area of synchronizing data with other kinds of cellphones. And it's why they're separating their devices from services revenue accounting a lot more than they used to.

Bottom line, that's what iPredict will happen, if RIM wants to keep its leadership in secure messaging.

But SMS revenue, I think, is safe.

UPDATE:  After reading CultOfMac's great description of iMessage, I think Apple made a great move having iMessage detect automatically when to send messages by SMS and when by iMessage. This means that many iOS users will make iMessage their primary messaging app, and iMessage as a platform will ease in to use. Once again Apple has won hands-down in usability by integrating a new feature into old features in a way that really fits how people work - like FaceTime's integrating into existing phone calls between iPhone users.

On the other hand, I don't think iMessage is going to take away BlackBerry market share anytime soon. Blackberry users use Blackberry e-mail and BBM not for SMSs, but because it ties securely into their Enterprise e-mail, and RIM's still the market leader there. If iMessage wants the Enterprise market, Apple needs to add the secure e-mail connectivity part.  That said, I still predict that RIM will release secure e-mail and BBM for iPhones and Android phones, just because executives are preferring to use them over Blackberries.

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what