Skip to main content

Google Plus users: 9 million or 657,000?

News is traveling around the web and being picked up by the media: After a very short time in existance, Google+ already has over 9 million users, and will pass 10 million soon.  It's taking over the social networking space, on its way to beating Facebook and Twitter, and finally Google has a solid success in social networking.

But is all this really true?

To be clear, I like certain aspects of Google+ a lot.  Hangouts are amazing, Huddles are a great idea, and their location-based mobile features are probably the start of a revolution.  So I'm not bashing Google+ when I say that they may not really have the millions of users that people are talking about.

My guess:  657,000, as of July 12.

If you look at all the articles talking about how many users Google+ has, you'll see that Google isn't saying.  The numbers all come from some pretty complex calculations that people are making, based on how many Google+ users they see with certain names, how many U.S. citizens have those names in recent census data, and how these numbers can be projected into an estimate of worldwide Google+ use.  All very mathematical and fairly scientific.  This post gives a great explanation of the best of these calculations.

I, on the other hand, turn to Google and ask Google to count all the pages on the web site "" that have the word "Google+" in the title.  If you browse around Google+, you'll see that this is the clearest indication of user home pages.  The result: 657,000.

This answer is consistent, regardless of whether you search when logged into your Google account or not, or where you search.  You can see this by clicking here

You can also click "next" to your heart's content, and see that all the search results after the first two are in fact Google+ user home pages. 

Several people in Google+ discussions have suggested similar Google searches that show much bigger numbers of results.  Several suggested variants on the following query:

which gives back just over 9 million results.  The problem is that if you go past results page 65 you'll see that most of the results shown aren't Google+ user home pages, but rather Google+ posts, photos, and other content. The reason for this is that Google searches with two search operator criterea will give results with only one of the criteria matched, as lower-down search results.  That's why in my search above I use just one operator and one search word.

The same is true for all Google searches that claim to show 9 million or so Google+ users - go down 60 screens and you'll see non-users.

Interestingly, Google themselves have been quiet about how many users they have.  They're letting the bloggers go wild, but they aren't saying a word themselves.  If they had 10 million users this soon, wouldn't they say something?  But if they don't, how can they burst the bubble that's been created by all the hype?

The fact is, 657,000 Google+ users is great for this early, when the users until now are primarily early adopters.  Go into Junior High schools around the world, they're all using Facebook and are not yet onto Google+. But the early adopter usage is very impressive.

If Google pipes up and says they have 10 million users, I'll be happy to admit that something in my Google search estimation must be wrong.  Until then, take all the numbers you see with a grain of salt.  Or maybe a whole shaker.

Google+ is a great system. Let's stick to the facts about how good it is, and leave the hype out.

Come on Google, give us some facts!

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware.

The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies, released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption.

Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-3 meter …

33 Indoor Location Technologies at Mobile World Congress 2017

The number of companies exhibiting indoor location technologies at the 2017 Mobile World Congress (MWC) skyrocketed to 33!

Before MWC started, we released our Guide to Indoor Location at MWC, with 23 companies:

During the conference we notified our guide recipients of 10 other indoor location exhibitors that we saw. (Sign up here to receive our guide and to be on our mailing list for next year's MWC.)

This is many more indoor location related exhibits that previous years. The area is growing by leaps and bounds! Our recent report on indoor location technologies analyzed and profiled almost 200 companies!

Here are some videos, so you can see the technologies in action, followed by a list of the other indoor location companies that were at MWC.

First up is Philips Lighting, with high-accuracy indoor location positioning based on LED light modulation and visible light communication (VLC) technology:

Next comes Estimote, makers of Bluetooth (BLE) beacons, who introduced self-mapping b…

See great indoor location tech from the 2017 testbed

The videos from the Indoor Location Testbed at GeoIoT World 2017 are now released! Here is your chance to see how these solutions performed in our real-world evaluation, in the videos below. The testbed evaluated each solution by walking around a real-world venue, the GeoIoT World 2017 conference, measuring performance at 10 pre-selected points.

Click here for the testbed report, which analyzes each solution's performance in a wide variety of metrics, including real-time accuracy, accuracy stabilization, consistency, latency, floor change, first fix, setup time & more.

Let's start with BlooLoc's tag-based solution, which achieved accuracy under 2m in real-time and under 1.5m after stabilization:

Then let's look at the infrastructure-free solution from GipsTech, which achieved accuracy under 2m without using any beacons or radio signals:

Next is GipsTech's solution with BLE added:

Next is BlooLoc's phone-based solution:

Finally, we see Accuware's solution…