Skip to main content

Apple, location logging, location search and PlaceBase

It's great when a few questions are answered by a single answer:
  1. What's Apple's Geo Team, formed when they acquired Placebase, working on?
  2. What's Apple doing with the logs they're keeping of user locations?
  3. What can Apple do in location services that Google doesn't already do?

Behold a new patent application by Apple that was just published, titled RELEVANCY RANKING FOR MAP-RELATED SEARCH.  This patent looks at how any sort of location-based search system, such as local business search, nearby friend search, etc., can tell the difference between locations that people go to a lot and locations that people don't go to or don't stay in.  In a nutshell, their method looks at logs of locations of lots of users, and from those logs, the method figures out which places get a lot of people going there and which don't. In other words, by looking at where millions of iOS users go, Apple can figure out what places are hot.

Their approach to doing this analysis is very sophisticated. They're not only looking at what where people go, they're looking at how long they stay there, how long they travel to get there, and what time of day they go.  They also account for whether people go there every day (e.g., they work there) or occasionally (e.g., they shop there).  So if an office building gets more people than a department store, the department store may be "hotter" because it gets lots more people that don't work there. And even if a 7-11 gets more people than a Ikea, the 7-11 gets people who drive by while the Ikea gets people that go specifically there.

Their method also takes repeat visits into account, based on the place being visited.  If a restaurant is visited by lots of people, it's popular. But if a restaurant gets a lot of visitors multiple times, it's worth recommending.

Even more interestingly, their method compares the sets of places that people go, and recommends places to new users based on the similar interests that are reflected in common places visited.  This is Collaborative Filtering at its finest, very similar to the technology introduced over 15 years ago for music recommendations.

The key is that all this processing is behind the scenes, analyzing logs of locations that iOS users go, and determining which places are hot and which are not.  This "hotness" is then used by a variety of location-based services to rank answers to user queries.

This patent was invented by two people.  One was Jaron Waldman, founder of Placebase, which Apple acquired in July 2009.  The second was Chad Richard, Director of Product Marketing at Apple, where he's been since before Placebase was acquired. So this appears to reflect research done at Apple in the time since Placebase was acquired.

Apple's had several other location-based technologies in recently published patent applications.  One is for Augmented Reality Maps, which was also invented by the former founder of Placebase. Another is for Points of Interest Based Directions, not related to Placebase. (Note that Nokia has a patent application for Contextually Appropriate Navigation Instructions that seems very related to Apple's notion of point-of-interest based directions.)

Will these technologies make a difference to Apple users? Will Apple find a way to combine them to produce something revolutionary? Grizzly Analytics subscribers will find out more in our next monthly report. Feel free to contact us by e-mail with any thoughts or comments.

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware.

The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies, released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption.

Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-3 meter …

33 Indoor Location Technologies at Mobile World Congress 2017

The number of companies exhibiting indoor location technologies at the 2017 Mobile World Congress (MWC) skyrocketed to 33!

Before MWC started, we released our Guide to Indoor Location at MWC, with 23 companies:

During the conference we notified our guide recipients of 10 other indoor location exhibitors that we saw. (Sign up here to receive our guide and to be on our mailing list for next year's MWC.)

This is many more indoor location related exhibits that previous years. The area is growing by leaps and bounds! Our recent report on indoor location technologies analyzed and profiled almost 200 companies!

Here are some videos, so you can see the technologies in action, followed by a list of the other indoor location companies that were at MWC.

First up is Philips Lighting, with high-accuracy indoor location positioning based on LED light modulation and visible light communication (VLC) technology:

Next comes Estimote, makers of Bluetooth (BLE) beacons, who introduced self-mapping b…

See great indoor location tech from the 2017 testbed

The videos from the Indoor Location Testbed at GeoIoT World 2017 are now released! Here is your chance to see how these solutions performed in our real-world evaluation, in the videos below. The testbed evaluated each solution by walking around a real-world venue, the GeoIoT World 2017 conference, measuring performance at 10 pre-selected points.

Click here for the testbed report, which analyzes each solution's performance in a wide variety of metrics, including real-time accuracy, accuracy stabilization, consistency, latency, floor change, first fix, setup time & more.

Let's start with BlooLoc's tag-based solution, which achieved accuracy under 2m in real-time and under 1.5m after stabilization:

Then let's look at the infrastructure-free solution from GipsTech, which achieved accuracy under 2m without using any beacons or radio signals:

Next is GipsTech's solution with BLE added:

Next is BlooLoc's phone-based solution:

Finally, we see Accuware's solution…