Skip to main content

Indoor navigation comes to iPhone in France

Most indoor location positioning systems rely on Wi-Fi signals - they look at the set of Wi-Fi hotspots that are in range of the phone, and how strong the signals are for each one, and use a database of hotspot locations or a collection of "signal strength fingerprints" to estimate the phone's current location.  This is how must indoor location systems on the market work, including Google's.

But here's the rub: iPhone's iOS doesn't let apps have the Wi-Fi signal strength data.  Many people have speculated why, and I suspect the reason is that they want to keep indoor positioning all to themselves. It's unfortunate, because Apple of all people should know that they win a lot by supporting 3rd-party developers on iOS. But that's how it is.

Two weeks ago we reported the first deployment of a new approach to indoor location, by SenionLab, using sensors in the phone (gyroscope, compass, accelerometer, ...) to detect phone movements and track location step by step.   This approach is called "sensor fusion," a.k.a. "inertial navigation."  Sensor fusion has been in research for years, and we've tracked start-ups bringing it to market.  Now it's here.

Most importantly, sensor fusion technology can in principle run on the iPhone.  But good sensor fusion needs some radio signals as well, to keep the motion sensing from going off track.  The deployment two weeks ago ran (so far) only on Android, combining sensor fusion with Wi-Fi signals, and not on iPhone.

Enter Pole Star, a French company with a U.S. headquarters in Palo Alto.  They started out with Wi-Fi based indoor location technology, and have now added sensor fusion along with Bluetooth signal processing.  Their combined approach has now had several deployments announced in France (see press releases 1, 2). Best of all, their system runs on iPhones.

Pole Star's Bluetooth-based positioning requires that sites deploy their BlueSpot beacons, shown here, which transmit signals that iPhones can use for positioning.  The Bluetooth signal data is combined with sensor fusion to provide accurate positioning.  Android devices can use this same data, along with Wi-Fi signal data, to achieve even more accuracy. Sites that don't deploy the BlueSpots can still use sensor fusion and Wi-Fi signals for positioning.

On both iPhone and Android, a much smoother and more accurate location positioning is delivered by the use of sensor fusion, than can be delivered using Wi-Fi or Bluetooth signals alone.

Grizzly Analytics predicts that sensor fusion will spread, in more apps like these from Pole Star and SenionLab.  We're tracking several other start-ups working on sensor fusion, along with many major mobile and chip companies.  Soon we'll see more start-up companies in this area being acquired, by either mobile OS makers, social network companies or chip makers, and then sensor fusion will be even more central to mobile infrastructure.

We look forward to seeing more and more sensor fusion, and other novel approaches, coming to market and bringing location services indoors!

Want to understand indoor location positioning technology, both on the market and in research at major mobile companies?  The Grizzly Analytics report on indoor location positioning technology analyzes research by Google, Microsoft, Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm, Cisco, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, CSR, Broadcom, STMicroElectronics, and many more, along with systems from over 30 start-up companies.

Popular posts from this blog

33 Indoor Location Related Start-up Acquisitions

  Acquisitions Continue in the Indoor Location Industry; Grizzly Analytics Shows Price Growth at the High End and Continuity at the Low End New York, NY, February 22, 2021 - Despite the recent pandemic, M&A deals in the indoor location area have maintained a steady pace of 4-5 deals a year. At the high end of the spectrum, prices have increased to up to $400 Million for the highest priced recent deal and $165 Million for the second highest. At the lower end, many earlier stage companies have been acquired in the $2-3 Million range. A newly updated report from Grizzly Analytics gives prices and strategic details for 33 acquisitions in the indoor location area.  While the highest priced indoor location acquisitions have historically involved chip-based technologies, recent acquisitions have been more varied. “A few years ago the focus of indoor location M&A was all around pure localization technologies. The biggest deal to date is in fact for a chip-based localization ...

Adding real value to smartphone camera pictures

Most technology features follow a similar path, from imitation to improvement to transformation.  First they imitate something that came before, like telephones imitating the telegraphs of yesteryear.  Then they improve on them, like phones entering individual homes. Then they transform the entire endeavor, completely surpassing the previous technology, like phones automatically connecting people without operator involvement, which enabled society to communicate in ways that telegraph users never contemplated. Cellphone cameras are following a similar path.  At the beginning cellphone cameras were imitating digital cameras, adding the convenience of carrying only one device but basically doing the same as digital cameras did.  Then they improved on them, both with quality improvements and with the ability to share pictures wirelessly without wiring the phone to a computer.  The ability to instantly share and synchronize pictures from a phone is somewhat transf...

See great indoor location tech from the 2017 testbed

The videos from the Indoor Location Testbed at GeoIoT World 2017 are now released! Here is your chance to see how these solutions performed in our real-world evaluation, in the videos below. The testbed evaluated each solution by walking around a real-world venue, the GeoIoT World 2017 conference, measuring performance at 10 pre-selected points. Click here for the testbed report, which analyzes each solution's performance in a wide variety of metrics, including real-time accuracy, accuracy stabilization, consistency, latency, floor change, first fix, setup time & more. Let's start with BlooLoc's tag-based solution, which achieved accuracy under 2m in real-time and under 1.5m after stabilization: Then let's look at the infrastructure-free solution from GipsTech , which achieved accuracy under 2m without using any beacons or radio signals: Next is GipsTech's solution with BLE added: Next is BlooLoc's phone-based solution: Fin...